Thoughtpick: A unique perspective of the Web and social media...
A unique perspective of the Web and social media...

September 10, 2009

Yahoo! “to Take on Twitter”: Beyond Far-fetched!

Yahoo meme

Yahoo! Meme

Is it really “wise” to try to take on well-established services or platforms by imitating them? Does the fact that a company has a high market share in a certain field automatically translate into its a guaranteed success in other fields? What is happening to product/service specialization? And why is everyone is trying to be a jack of all trades?

Tapping into my thoughts…

Meme T-Shirt!

Meme T-Shirt!

Most of the aforementioned questions have no definite, “right” or “wrong” answers but through experience, knowledge and certain statistics followed by predictions, one could deduce some logical answers or arguments.

Long before micro-blogging tightened its Tetris-like grasp around the throats of our blogs many of us frittered away more than one RSS feed on things known as memes.”

As I read “Yahoo! to take on Twitter“, I immediately thought: Is Yahoo! serious about this? Is it really offering a Twitter-clone service – Meme – to compete with Twitter? This is just not going to happen, meme will miserably fail, eventually at least!

The Why’s and How’s…

Apart from the fact that “Meme seems to lack in its features and in potential to surpass its competitors” and that “the company has a spotty record with Mash and SpotM“, Yahoo! should know better than to try to tap into a cluttered market that is dominated by the giant- Twitter, and that is already suffering from information overload!

I mean let’s take both Plurk and identi.ca, the two micro-blogging sites that have been operating for a while now, as an example.  These two services do provide valuable features and have their own target markets, yet they were unable to “really” compete with Twitter! Not to mention the few others, like Rejaw, that have tried to and completely disappeared! Why does Yahoo! think it will do any better?

Comparing Traffic: Identi.ca vs. Plurk vs. Twitter

Furthermore, and with the continuous demand for innovation vs. imitation, and the need for specialization rather than haphazard diversification, Yahoo! might actually be writing its own suicide note by choosing to go in this direction! Take Google’s failed attempt with Jaiku for example, could Yahoo! do better?

Tap with Me!

To conclude, I’d really like to hear your thoughts about this issue: Do you think Yahoo! has taken a wise step by trying to compete with Twitter? What can Yahoo! do to ensure that it won’t lose its users’ trust and loyalty if this venture fails? How do you think Meme can actually compete with Twitter, if possible?

May 7, 2009

Karma-lization! The Pros & Cons…

The concept of karma was first originated in India to describe a relationship of cause and effect; “the effects of all deeds are viewed as actively shaping past, present, and future experiences“. Hundreds of years later, the social media karma idea emerged heavily relying on the same traditional trend that goes: “Do onto others as you would do to yourself.”

karma

What goes around comes back around!

In a vast virtual world where each of the online users aim to seek recognition, be known, be heard, and be “someone” who people desire to be associated with, karma seems to be a fine defining ground of online intentions! Karma comes across as having the power to add balance to online relationships and differentiate between spammers, heavy advertisers, blabbers, time-wasters and those individuals who are really looking forward to make a change, invite others into their world and make them a part of it while being a part of theirs as well.

In life, there is always give and take! Karma ensures, to some extent, that this kind of relationship exists and persists between the members of social media communities therefore, good karma can only be earned by dedicating free time to positive community activities such as: [read full article >>]

Filed under: Research-Based Topics — Tags: , , , , , , , , , — Beirut @ 1:17 pm

April 28, 2009

Quub Micro-Blogging: Meowing its Way in the SM Jungle!

Has Twitter become the king of the Social Media jungle? What is the future of micro-blogging and is there a real threat against the Twitter kingdom? What can a new micro-blogging platform add to the so-far highly successful Twitter experience? And is Quub’s attempt to “meow” its way into the Social Media jungle going to end up in an utter failure?

As we all well know, every jungle has its king! Usually, the king of the jungle is the lion, and this is how it was for years and how I assume it will be for many years to come! If watching National Geographic, Animal Planet and the Discovery Channel has taught me one thing, it taught me that cats will never rule the jungle and accordingly, I think Quub will always be just a cub and whether we choose to use it or not, it will simply remain a little cat when compared to giant social media lions such as Twitter!

The idea behind Quub is very simple so why do I see it as a fragile cat, you might wonder? Well, I can think of many reasons dooming Quub to a sad yet definite failure if not end, here are a few:

  • Research & Development: Quub aims to allow users to literally answer the question “What are you doing?” assuming that people really care to know about when their friends are eating, sleeping, reading and so on. The real question is: Have they really done their research about this? Did they gather enough responses before spending money to create a service that I honestly would not use and do not see such a large audience for?
  • Features: Quub has added features that are unavailable in Twitter such as the public calendar yet do users really want that? Personally, I would not really like to use a completely public calendar even if my friends are the only ones able to see it.
  • Virality: Quub is not an open platform like Twitter which in turn limits their search-engine appearance by having everything locked until you are accepted thus limiting the element of viral growth dramatically.
  • Repetitiveness: “Quub helps you actually write your status updates”. This means that after a while of “Quubing” status updates may become both boring and monotonous!
  • Uniqueness: Many platforms such as Ning, Plurk and identi.ca aim to apply the micro-blogging method in disseminating information, Quub should have a very “different” element in its features, a unique spark to be able to shine through the clutter. I don’t see much of a difference in Quub rather I see a solid weakness in its limitations!
  • Server Problems/Site Unresponsiveness: Yes! Already! Many people who tried to access Quub were shocked to get the following message: “Error reading from remote server”!
  • User Needs: Quub, in my opinion, is more personal and with our busy lifestyles and many of us being time-poor. Therefore, I don’t think it is even close to being as desirable as Twitter since it lacks the ability of mixing business with pleasure! As Victor Panlilio puts it: “Another Internet-based time sink, as if we needed yet more of them…”

Have you even heard of Quub? That is a question I would like for you to answer. And if you have, what do you think of it? Would you use it? Do you believe it stands a chance?

Filed under: Web News — Tags: , , , , , , — Beirut @ 4:12 pm